4th February 2008

Not a perfect season, but still a perfect team

The Patriots got beat. They didn’t choke, they weren’t robbed by the referees, they didn’t even get outplayed, they just got beat. When the last hail mary fell to the ground rather than in the hands of Randy Moss it was a rare feeling of pure disappointment. There is usually a bad call to blame, or a player who can’t handle the pressure, or a Grady Little who forgets how to manage, but not today. Today there was no anger, just disappointment.

And yes, this was the most disappointing loss in my sports life. In 2003, after a ‘roided out Aaron Boone hit the game winning home run, I would have contested this claim. But looking back now, with the championships of ‘04 and ‘07, that loss seems like nothing. I’d like to think that next year, or a few years from today, I will look back on the 2008 Super Bowl and think, “It’s too bad, but at least they made up for it since”, but the overwhelming odds are that it won’t happen.

We knew, even in 2003, that the Red Sox would have another chance to win the World Series. Do we know now that the Patriots will ever, in our life times, get another chance for a perfect season? Of all the football seasons left, from now until you die, next year is the best opportunity they have of winning that 19th game. And, if you had to bet right now, what are the chances of that? 10%? 5%? After that it gets even more unlikely. When you factor in the potentially once-in-a-lifetime run of New England dominance, what with the success of the Red Sox and Celtics, the loss seems all that more tragic.

But in the end, this tragic ending can’t be pinned on the Patriots. Even in their one loss, the Pats played as close to perfect a game as you can hope for. The coaching was great, Tom Brady was his usual mistake-free self, the defense was terrific. The team’s one glaring problem in this game: the offensive line. But even they weren’t blowing assignments or being penalized. They played as well as they could against a great Giants rush.

And the Giants played as well as they could. They too were near perfect. Were they the better team? No. In the end things broke their way. Sometimes, when you put yourself in a position to win, a receiver will make a catch with their helmet, and an interception which would end the game will be inches out of the cornerback’s reach. Today was that day, and the Giants deserve the win; nothing can be taken away from them for catching some breaks. Giants fans should be very proud of their team, a team that did something no one thought they could do. Just be aware, I hope your team makes it back to the Super Bowl next year, because the Patriots will be their waiting for you.

In the end, as disappointed as I am, it doesn’t take away at all from what I admire about the 2007 Patriot team. They strove for perfection, and worked their asses off to achieve it. They played as a team, and were humble to the end. The Patriots may not have a perfect record, but they are the perfect team. And, because they’re the perfect team, they’ll be back.

There are currently 10 responses to “Not a perfect season, but still a perfect team”

  1. 1 On February 4th, 2008, dk said:

    It’s the two extremes of emotions that make watching sports and following a team so great. It was a great season and a great Superbowl actually, where every play mattered and everything was on the line until the end. Congrats to the Giants and Eli.

  2. 2 On February 4th, 2008, DoubleD said:

    I’ll admit I was pretty disappointed as well at first, but putting all the pieces together of the whole season we shouldn’t be upset. We still set numerous records, and yes we set a record for the longest undefeated streak. Granted, it wasn’t what we were going for (the perfecter perfect season over the 73 Miami team) but regardless, they played 17 undefeated games, and we played 18. It is still a page in the record books, even if it might be in size 8 font.

    I have to say though, I disagree with what you said about Brady’s performance. He wasn’t as spot on as he had been earlier in the year. Certainly was under more pressure than he ever had been before, but I would actually say I think Eli played a slightly better game than I think Brady did. It wasn’t necessarily the reason we lost, I think we had better receivers, which balanced out the difference between QBs. I agree though that the real problem was the Pats offensive line versus the Giants Defense. We were easily outdone there.

  3. 3 On February 4th, 2008, Kurti Monnier said:

    Spot on? No. But he still played mistake free football. Yes, he missed some throws, but he still had a very good game under the circumstances. No quarterback is truly perfect, completing 100% of their throws, but Brady played well enough to win. And they would have had either the Giants a) not played an almost perfect game and b) not had some good luck down the stretch.

    The offensive line was struggling, but it wasn’t for making mistakes, they simply were overpowered by the Giants’ line. I think the one part of the game that one could point to as being sub par, it was the decision not to attempt a 48 yard field goal on 4th and 13. Of course, that seems much more significant in retrospect, having lost by 3 points, and do you really trust Gostkowski to make it? I didn’t.

  4. 4 On February 5th, 2008, DoubleD said:

    I agree that no QB is perfect, and yes Brady was playing average for the NFL not average for TFB. I saw short passes that almost hit the dirt and otherwise bad throws that would have otherwise been just Brady going throw the motions in the regular season. Basically, I think us doing as well as we did had more to do with our skilled receivers than with Brady’s performance that game.

    Part of the problem was we went for the whole 9 yards all season (most touchdown passes, longest undefeated winning streak, longest prefect season) and I think Brady was out of it by the end.

  5. 5 On February 5th, 2008, Kurti Monnier said:

    While you may not notice missed passes as much when the win, Brady misses on a few throws in most games. His completion percentage for the Giants game was a solid 60% which, while slightly lower than his average, is by no means a huge drop off.

  6. 6 On February 7th, 2008, DoubleD said:

    This may be true, but like I said I think a lot of his passes were off target and either scooped up or otherwise skillfully completed by receivers.

  7. 7 On February 8th, 2008, Garon said:

    I have to disagree with somethings you say here Kurti. While I agree that you can not put this lost at Tom Brady’s feet because he was getting the snot kicked out of him all game, the Patriots by no means had close to a perfect game. First the Pats got the sh*t kicked out of them in the trenches, on both the offensive and defensive side. that O-line got there lunch handed to them which I think that no one is arguing that, but the D-line was pretty bad as well. They got no pressure on Eli for pretty much the entire game. The Gmens o-line played out of this world and did a great job of keeping Eli upright. Also I can think of 5 plays where the Pats had a chance to win this game. There was the Samuel missed INT that was thrown right to him, the Woods, “I need to do some curls”, fumble recovery where he got the ball taken right from his arms, the fact that three D-lineman had their hands on Eli and he got away and made a great catch, then on the other end Rodney had his hand on the ball and Tyree still caught it ON HIS HELMET!! (although I do not put any blame on Rodney at all for that), and finally with 30 seconds and three timeouts Brady misses a WIDE OPEN Jabar Gaffney the only time he had time in the pocket all game. They then had communication problems so they burned another timeout after an incompletion, then tried to go for the home run instead of trying to get into FG position. Ooh and one more, the fact that BB went for it on 4th and 13 instead of kicking a 48 yard FG. I do think the Giants completely and totally outplayed the Pats. In fact i am surprised the Pats had a chance to win that game. If I had watch that game without the score I would have thought the Giants won by 20+ points. The Giants had a great game and played as close to a perfect game I have ever seen. Yhey deserved that win and at this point all I can say is congratulation/

  8. 8 On February 9th, 2008, Jeff said:

    I pretty much agree with what Garon said. Also, I think the Pats are going to have a much rougher time of it next year as they will likely lose a few key players. There is a lot up in the air in the offseason (aging veterans on D retiring, Samuel & Moss as free agents, etc.). I think they are going to need to make some moves in the offseason in order to stave off a decline.

  9. 9 On February 11th, 2008, Kurti Monnier said:

    Garon, most of what you say makes my point. Almost all of the things you mention that didn’t go the Pats’ way are qualified by saying the the Giants’ counterpart did an excellent job. Sure, Woods got the ball pulled away from him. We all know he had possession, it’s not his fault no one saw it, and are you saying he didn’t try his hardest to hold on to the ball? Fine, he could be stronger, but that has nothing to do with how well he played in this game. The missed INT by Asante was hardly right to him, that would have been an amazing catch, the man is short and was jumping. As I’ve said all along, I agree that the field goal probably should’ve been kicked, but that’s in retrospect! It seems like a much more obvious decision after you lose by 3 points. You’re point about burning a timeout after an incompletion due to “communication problems” is just plain wrong. There was only time left for one play and it was smart to use a timeout to come up with the best one possible. Likewise, with 30 seconds left from deep in your own territory, you need to complete a deep ball just to get within field goal territory! You expected them not to throw deep on that drive? Give me a break. You’re left with accusing Brady of missing a few receivers. Go back and watch some replays, it happens every single game. This time they just happened to run into another team which played a perfect game. And they still had to get unlucky to lose it.

  10. 10 On February 12th, 2008, Garon said:

    Let me start from the bottom up. I realize that Brady is going to miss some targets and at the beginning of my post I had said that I would not begin to try to put this loss at Brady’s feet, however in past superbowls when the Pats needed a miracle drive Brady always delivered so call me spoiled. Yes there was 30 seconds on the clock, but they had 3 timeouts. That is a ton of time. They could have tried to complete 4-5 passes with a majority of them being in the middle of the field (which I would guess was open in a prevent defense) and Brady would not need as much time for protection. Instead they throw 2 bombs to a double covered Moss which everyone alive knew they would and did not complete on pass. Now to the possible FG. You are going to tell me that it is “hindsight” that the Pats should have kicked a 48 yarder on 4th and freaking 13. That is not hindsight it is a no brainer. Now the Asante almost catch. I will say that 9 times out of 10 Asante catches that ball. If you watch the replay it was not that difficult of a catch. It would have been a good catch but not by any means a great catch. And finally in my opinion the most pathetic play of the game. Woods got the ball stolen from him, could it have been ruled down with possession? It is possible, I have heard so great opinoins on both side, but that does not matter. The refs had not blown the whistle and he let the Giants take the ball right from his arms. It is inexcusable for that to happen. I think we saw a Pats team that played horrible and was lucky enough to be that close in the game, not the Giants being lucky they won the game.

Leave a Reply

Spread the Word
delicious
digg
technorati
reddit
magnolia
stumbleupon
yahoo
google